
Most established professionals have built sizeable networks of former clients/customers, colleagues, advisers, collaborators and industry contacts. LinkedIn may have added hundreds more names. But there is a difference between being connected to someone and having a good professional relationship with them.
Ask how many LinkedIn connections someone has, and the answer may reach the thousands. Ask who they could comfortably call tomorrow for advice, insight or collaboration (and who would feel equally comfortable calling them) and the list is usually much shorter.
A broad network still has value. Loose connections can expose you to different perspectives and unexpected opportunities. The problem arises when people mistake connection numbers for a thriving network that continually creates opportunities, delivers mutual value and supports professional growth.
Instead of continually asking how to expand your network, ask: Where should you invest more thoughtfully in the relationships you already have?
Your time is limited. Spreading it evenly can mean that the relationships with the greatest potential for mutual value receive surprisingly little attention.
Start by identifying 20–30 people from your existing network and consider:
The purpose is not to compile a list of people to sell to. It is to decide where greater attention to relationship development could be valuable to both parties.
The most senior or best-connected person you know is not automatically your most valuable contact. Someone with a smaller network who understands your work may be a better collaborator. A former colleague may offer honest advice you would struggle to get elsewhere. A peer in a complementary discipline may provide useful insight or challenge your thinking.
Potentially valuable relationships can include former clients who have changed organisations but appreciate the value you bring, previous colleagues whose careers have taken a new direction, contacts in complementary businesses, natural connectors and people with relevant sector knowledge.
It’s therefore sensible to periodically ask yourself where there is genuine trust, relevance and a reason for you to remain connected.
A quality network works in both directions. If you define priority contacts only as people who might help you, the relationship will quickly feel one-sided.
Think about what might genuinely be useful to them: an introduction, insight, invitation, shared experience, comment on an idea, collaboration or simply being a useful sounding board.
Choose five contacts whose professional relationship you’d like to maintain or strengthen. Against each person, write down:
If you cannot answer the first question, resist the temptation to guess. Instead, learn more about them.
Not every professional relationship requires the same level of contact. A simple three-layer model can make your network feel more manageable and effective.
These are people with whom there is strong mutual trust and value. You understand one another’s work and priorities, and both invest in maintaining the relationship. These people warrant meaningful time and regular points of contact.
These are people you would like to know better because there is relevant common ground. The next step may be a conversation, a shared project, or an opportunity to exchange ideas.
These are people worth staying connected with, but for whom occasional interaction or visibility is enough for now. This group still provides breadth and may create unexpected opportunities.
Be mindful that people can move between these groups as circumstances change. The purpose is not to label anyone permanently. It is to be realistic about where your attention goes.
When deciding where a relationship belongs, consider four things:
These are more useful measures than job titles, follower counts or assumptions about who might generate work. They can also help you identify what’s missing from a relationship and where to focus your efforts. For example, if there’s mutual interest but little understanding of each other’s work, arrange a conversation to explore where you might be able to help one another.
Quality over quantity doesn’t mean cutting people out of your professional network. It’s about being more selective with how you invest your networking time.
Consider how you’re spending that time. Do you regularly attend events or groups without building worthwhile relationships? Are you repeatedly trying to engage people who show little interest in reciprocating? Are you maintaining visibility in places that are no longer relevant to your professional goals?
Relationships take time to develop, so avoid judging activities purely on immediate commercial returns. Networking can also provide valuable learning, insight and friendships. However, it’s worth periodically assessing your activities and asking what you would genuinely lose if you stopped.
Where the answer is ‘very little’, consider redirecting that time to strengthening existing relationships or to exploring opportunities more closely aligned with your priorities.
Complete a 20-minute network review
You don’t need a complicated database for this. Simply set aside 20 minutes and:
Be specific. Rather than simply writing ‘keep in touch’, consider arranging a conversation, sharing a useful insight or exploring an opportunity to collaborate.
You don’t need to contact everyone immediately. The aim is to choose more deliberately where to invest your time and how to build relationships that benefit both parties.
A thriving professional network isn’t measured by the number of names it contains, but by the opportunities, support and mutual value those relationships create.
Extended Thinking can help you align your networking activity with your wider business development priorities. Contact us or call 01483 429111.